It smells like a nice product... but not square.

Summary of user reviews:

4 reviews. 3 clearly positive, 1 frankly negative — and not a small detail, a real breaking point (water is unforgiving).

Positive points:

• 3 out of 4 users speak of good overall quality (materials, durability, finish)
• 2 out of 4 insist on the successful aesthetic side (more beautiful in real life, elegant)
• 1 out of 4 highlights a “wow” effect / attracts attention (differentiating design)
• 1 in 4 mention that it does not move after 6 months (correct durability)

Basically: visual + qualitative feeling = validated by the majority.

Negative points:

• 1 in 4 users report a critical problem: false water resistance (30m unusable even for washing dishes)

And there… that’s not a detail. A watch that leaks with water = product problem or lame marketing promise.

Shared/mixed points:

• Perceived quality: 3 find it solid/qualitative, 1 speaks of a serious failure

So either isolated defect... or irregular quality control. (and that, frankly, stinks a little)

Advice :

• If you want a stylish, lightweight watch that stands out from the crowd, you can go for it — it’s visually appealing
• On the other hand, don't believe for a second in the announced waterproofness. Not even for the dishes

Cash conclusion: Good “pleasure” watch, bad “utility” watch. You take it for the looks. Not for absolute reliability.