Concrete gains: Touch + buttons, GNSS multi-bands, reading/HRV, Solar (optional), longer GPS autonomy, more recent optical cardio sensor, more fluid carto guidance. In training, it translates into less "bicycle pump" gaits under canopy, adjusted sessions when sleeping sleeps, and a reassuring energy margin in hike/long trail. Nothing dull. Just better.
The amoled rebat everyday life: readable interval screens, sharper speed schemes, super clean cards, clear widgets. Revised ergonomics, more modern, restitution of more pleasant efforts. A little lower autonomy in pure GPS, but SmartWatch surprisingly enduring. It was not won. That works.
If you seriously hesitate between these two, we dissected the pragmatic differences in the concrete analysis of the Garmin 955 against 965 (yes, we put the link here because the question comes back every day). Voluntary rehearsals. Important.
955: more stable gaits between buildings, reading so as not to force a wobbly day, easy autonomy for two weeks. 965: more comfortable look and towers reading in a track session, a carto more readable for the blind SL. 945: If tight budget, it holds the charge, but accept differences in large buildings.
955 Solar: Sweet Spot Energy/Trace. 965: Visual comfort in climbing with Climbpro, very pleasant trace followed. 945: It follows, of course, but precision sometimes falls into tight beech trees. On arrival, not death - but for the appearance, it matters.
The three go fast. 965 makes the bicycle power screen readable at 40 km/h (we see the area of a glance), 955 lightens the mental load on the autonomy. 945 does the job if you stay simple in the fields. The key? Profit your screens, repeat the transitions. The watch will not replace that.
955/965: Readiness + HRV give a simple setting not to give in to the euphoria of good days. We keep our heads cold. 945: Active listening + Body Battery, it works too. Less fine, of course. But sufficient with a paper notebook (yes, paper) to objectify the sensations.
For the record, if you come from an old duo, take a look at our precise comparison Forerunner 935 against 945: it is clear how Garmin was already encroaching the useful bricks, without powder in the eyes.
Before buying, measure your wrist. 47 mm go on most wrists, but an adjusted shirt likes less. Try if possible. Also check the type of bracelet (22 mm) and the presence of preloaded regional cards - practical if you travel little. After unpacking: firmware update, sensors twinning, installation of useful sports profiles only (do not overload), GNSS test on a loop you know. Then an easy session to running the cardio belt if you wear one. Simple, effective.
Budget: 945 is often below, 955 in the middle (solar above), 965 at the top. Yes, the Amoled costs. But if you look at your watch 30 times a day, visual fatigue also weighs. Everyone has their own arbitration. And if you compare 955 Solar/965 only by autonomy, reread you have to choose the Forerunner 955 Solar version. We avoid lukewarm purchases.
Finally, if you still hesitate between screens and endurance, the article on screen and autonomy between Forerunner 265 and 965 gives a good reading grid transposable to your case. And for the trail, the house selection of the best garmin for trail remains your field compass.
Please share by clicking this button!
Visit our site and see all other available articles!