Summary of user reviews:

It really divides. Big wave of 5★… but not blind. The product appeals for its retro look and its ultra light side, except that behind it, there are a lot of quibbles about readability and size. Basically: aesthetic favorite, technical compromise.

Positive points:

• Retro design / vintage look → ~20 usersThe real trigger. 80s/90s nostalgia, “modernized old Casio” effect.
• Lightness / comfort → ~12 users“We don’t feel it.” Clearly designed for everyday use without constraints.
• Full features (price) → ~15 usersWorld times, chrono, alarms, dual display... for this price, it's pretty creamy.
• Value for money → ~14 usersConsensus: difficult to do better at this price.
• Ease of use (after getting started) → ~6 usersA bit of a headache at the beginning...then it's smooth sailing.

Negative points:

• Dial/screen readability → ~18 usersBig black spot. Temperamental viewing angle, low contrast, small numbers. Some people talk about one of the worst Casio screens.
• Size too small → ~16 users“Children’s watch” effect on a wide wrist. Clearly not for everyone.
• Strap quality/materials → ~12 usersThin bracelet, cheap plastic, durability that raises doubts.
• Scratch sensitivity (screen) → ~6 usersFragile plastic. It scores quickly… sometimes too quickly.
• Settings/ergonomics → ~5 usersNot super intuitive. A bit annoying to configure.

Shared/mixed points:

• ReadabilitySome people get used to it. Others give up. It depends… clearly.
• SizePerfect for small wrists. Disaster for others.
• Overall qualityBetween “safe bet” and “worse than before”. Nostalgia vs reality.

Advice :

Do you want style? Dark. It's a pleasure watch, light, retro, fun to wear.

But if you want to read the time quickly, without a perfect angle, or if your wrist is a little strong… forget it.

Frankly ? It’s a visual crush. Not an ultra practical tool.