On the technical sheet side, Amazfit T-Rex 2 claims up to 24 days of typical use, approximately 26 hours of continuous GPS, and up to 45 days in economy mode. This is already huge for a watch with an AMOLED screen.
There T-Rex 3 goes even further: around 27 days of typical use, 13 days of intensive use, more than 40 hours in precise GPS mode, and much more in eco GPS modes. In summary, on paper, in this Amazfit T-Rex 2 vs Amazfit T-Rex 3 duel, the 3 takes a slight advantage.
The theory is good, but what matters is the load you see on the screen.
In real mixed use (notifications, sleep monitoring, 2–3 GPS sessions per week, limited Always-On):
Obviously, if you spend your time in high precision GPS + maps, you will drop these figures on the T-Rex 3. The screen and navigation are consuming. But you have the choice: eco GPS modes, reduced brightness, deactivation of certain sensors.
Basically, autonomy should not be the main reason to avoid the T-Rex 3. In this Amazfit T-Rex 2 vs Amazfit T-Rex 3 comparison, both are largely “in the green” on the battery side. The 2 remains monstrous, the 3 keeps the margin despite its more ambitious screen.
A little method point, because EEAT is not just a fashionable word:
The impressions, figures and feelings of this comparison Amazfit T-Rex 2 vs Amazfit T-Rex 3 come from this area, not just marketing sheets. If Amazfit pushes a big update that really changes behavior, I'll put a release note above the article.
The two watches play in the court of Multi-satellite dual-band GPS. The T-Rex 2 already works with dual bands and several systems, which is more than enough for trail running, hiking, light mountain biking. The tracks are clean, the distances consistent, you don't have the impression of running into walls.
With the Amazfit T-Rex 3Amazfit pushes a more recent generation: modernized dual-band GPS, 6 satellite systems, better management in difficult areas (forests, narrow streets). The tracks are more stable, the turns are better taken, the drifts are less frequent.
We're not going to pretend: if you're obsessed with meter precision for pure performance, you'll end up with a dedicated cardio belt and a very competition-oriented ecosystem anyway. But for 95% of runners and hikers, the GPS of the T-Rex 2 is already very good, that of the T-Rex 3 is... very reassuring.
On the T-Rex 2you already have:
For many people, this is enough to cover hiking, trail running and basic mountain outings.
There Amazfit T-Rex 3 adds a game-changing layer:
If you are very into altitude difference, orientation and committed hiking, it is worth checking out this comparison Amazfit T-Rex 2 vs T-Rex 3 with our advanced comparison of the best watches with altimeter. This allows us to situate T-Rexes in relation to real references of the genre.
On the health side, both do the job: heart rate, SpO₂, sleep monitoring, stress, PAI, VO₂max, training load analysis. The base is the same, with finer differences in the software processing on the T-Rex 3 side.
On the “smart” functions, however, things are getting worse:
If you want to stay in the Amazfit universe but with a more urban style, you can take a look at our complete test of the Amazfit GTR 3 Pro watch. This puts the positioning of T-Rexes versus more “urban” models into perspective.
Both watches run under Zepp OSwith synchronization in the Zepp app. You recover:
No compulsory subscription to use the essentials. The interface is clear, but sometimes busy: you have pages of data that the majority will never read. This remains a good basis for this Amazfit T-Rex 2 vs Amazfit T-Rex 3 comparison, both benefiting from the same ecosystem.
At launch, Amazfit T-Rex 2 was around €229–249. Today, you often find it much lower, especially during promotional periods. This is where the watch becomes really indecent in terms of quality/price ratio.
There T-Rex 3it is more likely to be around €249–299 depending on the time and the stores. Given the combo of XXL screen, maps, modernized dual-band GPS, NFC, microphone and additional sports, it remains very competitive with the market.
If you find that the T-Rex format is too massive for your daily life, keep in the back of your mind the detailed test option of the lightweight Amazfit Bip 6 watch. Same Zepp ecosystem, but more discreet format and even lower price.
If after this Amazfit T-Rex 2 vs Amazfit T-Rex 3 comparison you clearly recognize yourself as “T-Rex 2 profile”, the most logical thing is to take advantage of the promotions:
See the price of the Amazfit T-Rex 2 on Amazon
If the screen, offline maps and smart functions make the difference for you, the T-Rex 3 is the natural candidate:
See the price of the Amazfit T-Rex 3 on Amazon
Both links are there to save you time. You compare, you see the real difference in price, and you decide based on your use, not just the technical sheet.
You do day hikes, short trails, a bit of bivouac, you want to see your elevation, your cardio, your sleep, but you don't spend your life zooming in on a map on your wrist.
You train several times a week: running, weight training, cycling, some competitions. You want clean stats, sleep tracking, a watch that doesn't annoy you.
You love stats, you do a lot of trail running, serious hiking, you travel and you want everything on your wrist: maps, clean tracks, autonomy on big outings.
If you want to explore other “indestructible” options in the same spirit, you can compare with our selection of ultra-robust unbreakable connected watches. It helps to see if you stay Amazfit… or if you go for something else.
Basically, if you just want an outdoor watch that can handle everything, the Amazfit T-Rex 2 remains the best smart deal. If you want your wrist as a dashboard with maps, large screen, more daily functions, the Amazfit T-Rex 3 tick the boxes. And there, you understand why she is so attractive.
By David Deteve – editor & field tester. Impressions of this comparison Amazfit T-Rex 2 vs Amazfit T-Rex 3 come from real releases, not from a product sheet.
Please share by clicking this button!
Visit our site and see all other available articles!