Garmin Forerunner 55 vs. Coros Pace 2: A Comparative Review


The Garmin Forerunner 55 and the Coros Pace 2 target the same audience: demanding runners and athletes. One focuses on Garmin reliability and a refined interface. The other offers an unrivaled autonomy/weight ratio.

Objective: to provide you with a detour comparison to choose quickly.

2. Technical specifications

Design and dimensions

Weight, diameter (42 mm vs 42 mm), thickness (11.6 mm vs 11.9 mm).

Screen

Forerunner 55: MIP 1.04 ″, 208 × 208 px. PACE 2: MIP 1.2 ″, 240 × 240 px.

Sensors and connectivity

GPS + Galileo vs GPS + Glonass + Beidou, optical cardio, baro altimeter (pace 2).

3. Sports functions and health follow -up

Profiles: 20 vs 13 (+trail, triathlon).

GPS accuracy: ± 3 m vs ± 2 m.

Optical heart rate: gap <2 BPM.

Advanced measures (VO2max, VFC, lactic threshold).

4. Autonomy and recharge

Announced autonomy: 8 p.m. GPS / 14 J vs 30 h gps / 20 d.

Real test: 6 p.m. vs 28 h.

Charging time: 1 h vs 2 h (50 % in 40 min).

5. User experience and interface

Menu: 5 plugs VS wheel+2 buttons.

App: Garmin Connect vs Coros app.

Notifications: identical, Garmin poster + info.

6. Price and availability

199 € vs € 169. Opportunity: ~ 150 € vs ~ 130 €.

7. Advantages and disadvantages

Model Strengths Weak points
Forerunner 55 Ergonomics, ecosystem, lightness Limited autonomy, no altimeter
Coros Pace 2 Autonomy, baro altimeter, metrics Complex interface, slow recharge

8. FAQ

9. Verdict and recommendations

Beginner or ecosystem: Forerunner 55.

Long distance, advanced metrics: Pace 2.

Buy Forerunner 55 | Buy pace 2

Recent Articles


Exit mobile version