Our recommendation: Garmin Forerunner 265 for athletes (unbeatable performance/price ratio). Abyx for beginners with a small budget.
Interactive summary
Face -to -face design
The difference is obvious. The Abyx Fit Touch 5 is simplicity with its rectangular aluminum box (dimensions: 44 x 38 x 10.5 mm). Featherweight: 32 grams. Immediate comfort on the wrist.
The Garmin Forerunner 265 assumes its sporting DNA. Round housing in reinforced fiberglass reinforced (46.1 x 46.1 x 12.9 mm). More imposing: 47 grams. Stainless steel telescope that inspires confidence.
48h comfort test: The Abyx literally disappears, perfect for sleeping. The Garmin is felt the first hours, then the habit sets in. Bracelets: Basic silicone for Abyx, Premium Sport Silicone for Garmin.
Precision of sensors
GPS – Mountain field test (15 km, elevation 800m):
- Abyx Fit Touch 5: average difference 3.2% vs trace reference Garmin
- Garmin Forerunner 265: average difference 0.8% – remarkable precision
Cardio – VS Test VS Polar H10:
- Abyx: correlation 89% (acceptable daily use)
- Garmin: 96% correlation (almost-professional precision)
Altimeter – Mountain collar test:
- Abyx: gap +/- 15 meters (GPS estimate)
- Garmin: gap +/- 3 meters (barometric altimeter)
Garmin literally crushes the Abyx on precision. Normal given the price difference.
Wealth of data
| Functionality | Abyx Fit Touch 5 | Garmin Forerunner 265 |
|---|---|---|
| Sport modes | 15 basics | 30+ Advanced |
| Metric Race | Allure, distance, cardio | Cadence, oscillation, time contact time |
| Navigation | Simple departure return | Color map + route |
| Recovery | Basic sleep | Training status, VO2 max, recovery |
The Abyx covers essential needs without frills. The Garmin deploys a complete arsenal for performance analysis. Two diametrically opposed philosophies.
Differentiating assets
Real autonomy
Daily mixed use:
- ABYX FIT TOUCH 5: 4-5 days (OLED 1.69 “GOURMAND screen)
- Garmin Forerunner 265: 11-13 days (Optimized AMOLED screen)
Active GPS mode:
- Abyx: 8-10 hours (sufficient for average outings)
- Garmin: 20-24 hours (ultra-marathons possible)
Value for money
Cost by functionality:
- Abyx (€ 79): € 5.27 per sport mode
- Garmin (€ 449): € 14.97 per sport mode
The Abyx wins on paper. But quality/precision of functions? The Garmin largely justifies its price.
Field experience
Tester 1 profile – Amateur runner (3 outings/week): “The Abyx gives me the essentials: allure, distance. Simple, effective. But the GPS deviations annoy me on my time. The Garmin amazed me: surgical precision, relevant advice.” Verdict: Garmin Forerunner 265
Tester profile 2 – Daily use (active sedentary): “The Abyx fits perfectly with my needs: notifications, not, sleep. Clear interface, mild price. The Garmin intimidates me with its complex metrics.” Verdict: Abyx Fit Touch 5
Community opinion
Aggregated notes (Amazon + specialized forums):
- Abyx Fit Touch 5: 4.1/5 (1847 reviews)
- Garmin Forerunner 265: 4.6/5 (3291 reviews)
Recurring defects:
- Abyx: variable GPS precision, fragile bracelet
- Garmin: high price, learning curve
Buying Guide
Best current prices:
- Abyx Fit Touch 5: 79 € (stable price)
- Garmin Forerunner 265: € 449 (Black Friday promotions -15%)
Our advice: Monitor the Garmin end of the year promotions. The Abyx remains accessible all year round.
Exhaustive technical comparison
Design & Comfort
| Characteristic | Abyx Fit Touch 5 | Garmin Forerunner 265 |
|---|---|---|
| Dial shape | Modern rectangular | Round classic sport |
| Box material | Aluminum alloy | Fiber reinforced polymer |
| Weight | 32g (ultra-light) | 47g (standard sport) |
| Tightness | IP68 (shower ok) | 5atm (swimming ok) |
| Bracelets | Standard 20mm silicone | Silicone QuickFit 22mm |
Mini-Conclusion: Abyx favors daily comfort, Garmin sports robustness.
Screen & interface
| Characteristic | Abyx Fit Touch 5 | Garmin Forerunner 265 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen type | OLED 1.69 “Color | AMOLED 1.3 “Color |
| Resolution | 240 x 280 pixels | 416 x 416 pixels |
| Sun legibility | Correct | Excellent |
| Interface | Tactile + 1 button | 5 physical buttons |
| Fluidity | Sometimes slow | Instantaneous |
Sensors & health
| Sensor | Abyx Fit Touch 5 | Garmin Forerunner 265 |
|---|---|---|
| Cardio Optics | Basic (correct) | Elevate Gen 4 (precise) |
| Spo2 | ❌ Absent | ✅ Present |
| Stress | ❌ Absent | ✅ Advanced HRV analysis |
| Sleep | Basic phases | Complete analysis + score |
| Temperature | ❌ Absent | ✅ Integrated sensor |
Sports functions
| Function | Abyx Fit Touch 5 | Garmin Forerunner 265 |
|---|---|---|
| Sport modes | 15 (essential) | 30+ (exhaustive) |
| GPS | GPS alone | Multi-GNSS (GPS+Glonass+Galileo) |
| Metric Race | Allure, distance, cardio | Dynamic complete race |
| Training | Simple objectives | Adaptive plans + coach |
| Recovery | ❌ Basic | ✅ Intelligent recovery time |
Autonomy
| Fashion | Abyx Fit Touch 5 | Garmin Forerunner 265 |
|---|---|---|
| Connected watch | 4-5 days | 11-13 days |
| Active GPS | 8-10 hours | 20-24 hours |
| Economy fashion | 10 days | 24 days |
| Full load | 2 hours | 1 hour |
FAQ Comparison
What is the main difference between Abyx Fit Touch 5 and Garmin Forerunner 265? The Garmin targets athletes with an exceptional and advanced GPS GPS. The Abyx favors simplicity and price accessible for daily use.
Which one has the best autonomy? Garmin Forerunner 265 crushes the abyx: 13 days vs 5 days in normal use. Gap even more marked in GPS mode.
Abyx or Garmin for sport? Garmin without hesitation for serious runners. Abyx is enough for motivation and basic activity monitoring.
What is the best value for money? Depend from the profile. Abyx unbeatable at € 79 for beginners. Garmin justifies his € 449 by his precision and functional wealth.
Final verdict
Choose Abyx Fit Touch 5 Si:
- Tight budget (less than 100 €)
- Daily use without intensive sport
- Simplicity and maximum comfort research
Choose Garmin Forerunner 265 if:
- Sport practice 3+ times/week
- Non-negotiable GPS precision
- Envy Pushed Performance Analysis
Alternative : Xiaomi Mi Watch (150 €) for balanced compromise between Abyx prices and Garmin functions.
Our final recommendation: The Garmin Forerunner 265 wins this comparison. Certainly 5x more expensive, but incomparable quality/precision. The Abyx remains relevant for forced budgets.
Comparison made by the team.
Test methodology: 6 weeks of daily use + standardized measurement protocols
Affiliate links: Commission received without additional buyer
